Sharebuilder broker review
ShareBuilder looks good for the passive investor.
(Check out all of our broker reviews here)
ShareBuilder online brokerage has a new owner. They are now part of the ING Direct group that specializes in savings with good earnings. Now you can link your savings account to your ShareBuilder account for improved returns. ShareBuilder is always ranked in the top 5 of online brokerages because it has reasonable fees and commissions, a readily accessible trading system and good customer service rather than support.
You do not have to place a minimum amount of money with ShareBuilder in order to open an account and they do not charge a maintenance fee. ShareBuilder offer a unique service among brokerages with their automatic investing and reinvesting. The target market is the passive investor. The small saver who has a regular amount of cash salary deducted and wants it all invested but doesn’t want to self-manage the portfolio. So if you are looking to make ALL of your savings work but can’t be bothered watching the Dow Jones index or making limit orders then ShareBuilder is for you. ShareBuilder will give even the small savers access to the high-priced shares with fractional shares. For example if you wanted a piece of Microsoft but only had a hundred dollars saved, ShareBuilder would place a part of a share in your portfolio and you would earn pro-rata dividends and capital growth.
All of the savers’ portfolio is in stocks or other investments all of the time because of automatic investment and reinvestment of earnings by ShareBuilder and the investor is not involved in any of the decisions or actions. The passive investor will probably be attracted by the ShareBuilder headline price of $4 trades but the more active day trader would be more wary of these ‘window’ trades. This commission is only available on buys and once a week on Tuesdays. You have no influence on say the limit price or even the timing of the sale. When you place a sell transaction the commission is $9.95. While this is about the market average, day traders and active stock pickers can do better at other discount brokerages.
ShareBuilder offers three alternative savings plans to customers. They are the ‘Basic’ the ‘Standard’, and the ‘Advantage Plan’. The Basic plan is free, does the $4 automatic stock buys and makes ShareBuilder the best value choice among the competing savings companies. The Standard Plan has a monthly fee of $12 and gives 6 free automatic investments plus additional ones at $2 each. The Advantage Plan is pricier still at $20 per month, but with many more free offers; 20 automatic investments and further investments for $1 each. Real time and options trades are a single price with ShareBuilder no matter which plan you opt for. ING mutual funds are also on offer through free trades by ShareBuilder.
With Sharebuilder the saver is buying more into a strategy than developing their own. The strategy is automatic investment and zero cash holding. Their rates for automatic trades are discounted so as to encourage the passive investor while fractional shares ensure all of the money is working all of the time. In this way, wealth is built up over the long term. The price you pay for this passive investing ShareBuilder strategy is all front-loaded. For example if you looked to put $100 each month into Exchange Trade Funds $8 per month or $96 in a year is a big cost and your ETFs need to earn over 8.6% before you start to show a profit. There are better ways to get into mutual funds but it does require effort on the part of the investor. This price is just too high for the savvy trader.
Customer service at ShareBuilder is just that. If you want customer support with lots of high-tech platforms and research data to self-manage your investments then there are many cheaper online brokerages out there.
What is a Ponsi scheme? Who is this Bernard Madoff?
A Ponsi or Ponzi scheme is a confidence trick. Pyramid scams or schemes are similarly confidence tricks. All confidence tricks have 4 characteristics in common. Ponzi schemes like pyramid schemes all begin with a promise. They hold out the tempting vision of extraordinary gains. Confidence tricks all have an air of exclusivity and special inclusiveness about them. All of the big cons are shrouded in mystery and pray on people’s desire to believe in ‘magic’ secrets or individuals. Finally Ponsi and pyramid schemes inflate to unrealistic levels and burst leaving the victims in varying degrees of distress and always considerably worse off than the started.
Take the Bernard Madoff con for example. The biggest ever recorded. The promise was of big 8 to 13% returns on investment, no matter what the market was doing. How unbelievable in hindsight? It was exclusive at it’s core, beginning with wealthy New York Jewish investors. Madoff wouldn’t take just anybody’s money and the more he said ‘no’ the more appealing his specially inclusive club became. It was a truly Worldwide club at the end but one hedge fund, the Fairfield Greenwich Group, sunk more than $7 billion into the Madoff Ponzi scheme while at the same time encouraging others to invest. They all believed that the man himself was somehow endowed with special knowledge or super investment X-ray vision.
What was really scary about the Madoff Ponzi scam was how long it was able to inflate. Over 20 years the inward flow of funds was exponentially increasing to cover large payouts that were regularly demanded. But there was never enough real profit to deliver on the promise for everybody and so the bubble had to burst at some point.
Pyramid schemes likewise promise the unwary victims large profits that come entirely from bringing in others to join the scheme rather than turnover from any genuine investment or authentic sales of goods to customers. Some schemes hide their secret nature behind ‘a product’, but mostly this just hides the pyramid structure. They even give pyramid schemes a pseudo management jargon style name, ‘multi level marketing’ or MLM. BEWARE!
There are two warning signs that a product is the veil over a pyramid scheme. 1) overloading of stock onto victims and 2) a chronically low level of actual sales. Stock overloading is when a company’s bonus making program pushes associates to buy excess product. More in fact than they could ever hope to sell.
Many so-called MLMs are in fact pyramid schemes that rely on the current influx of investments to pay off the older commitments. All of them inflate to bursting levels because the commission levels are simply unsustainable. The only way to feed the ongoing product bonus payments is to recruit more victims often at a very high price, to maintain the cash flow.
The long and short of this recession
Most people, when thinking about stocks, only consider the possibility of making money off of investing by picking companies that will make a profit. What most people don’t know is that there is a ton of money to be made by investing in just the opposite, companies that they believe are going to lose money. In fact, many would argue that this system keeps prices in check with reality. This article will discuss the basics of longing a stock, and its inverse, shorting a stock. Moreover, this article will discuss why so many are getting rich off a stock market that is tanking, while others are losing their retirements.
Longing a stock is the same thing as buying a stock, with expectations that the companies stock will increase in value over time, and in turn so will its stock price. Most people new to investing would think then that this market is terrible for investing, when in fact, the opposite is true for so many. While there are still many great companies to long while investing when the market is in a recession (as I discussed in this article yesterday where I looked at the 20 companies with the greatest percentage gains in share price over the past year), there are way more stocks that you could short, because you think their value will decrease.
Shorting a stock, as mentioned above, simply takes an approach and invests in options, with which they can profit off of the downturn of the economy as it relates to individual stocks and or on the outlook of a particular companies weak future. Take retailers in general during a recession for example, if you have unemployment rising and people with poor outlooks in landing a job in the near future, you would know that their needs for certain products and such would decline, as their incomes lowered or ceased. Rather than going out and buying new things, they would likely choose to save money and repair their existing goods. You could see that companies are not meeting expectations as sales continue to plunge, taking a toll on the stock, and make an educated guess that they will continue their decline for the foreseeable near future, and short the stock.
Shorting stocks does come with major risks, especially if buying on margin, however, this article was only intended to help the average investor see that there is potential to make a ton of money even when there is a recession at hand.
I will continue this discussion in the near future with certain insight on how to get started with trading in options, for those whom care to hedge their existing portfolios. I truly hope this helps open up a world of investing many never knew about or considered.
Check out my RSS feeds to easily keep track of updates to my site, or just start stopping bye, I’m certain it will be worth your time. Heck, it’s free.
Did you find this article interesting? If so, please check out some more of my work – here are some below that I recommend that may relate to the above subject:
-
What happened to the stock market, how did we get into this financial mess, and when will the economy recover?
-
Nationalization of the American banking Industry; What does it mean for taxpayers and investors?
When will this recession, stock market crash end? Just look at actual earnings compared to forecasts.
Everybody has to throw in their two cents, and the predictions have been wide and varied, some predict the end of this recession will happen soon, by the end of the year in fact, while others say this will last clear through 2011. Who should you believe and why? What are investors looking for before they bring their money back to the stock market? When investors believe there is too much volatility in the market, they tend to flock to safer investments outside of equities, namely they invest in bonds.
The longest bear market and recession in the past 50 years, besides the one we are currently facing, happened this same decade, which some may find hard to believe. From March 2000 to October 2002 the DJIA saw a decrease of nearly 50%, yep, the decrease that preceded the run to over 14,000 by the beginning of October when it neared its peak. Having said that, the people that predicted the market bottom potentially made off like bandits as they realized the companies were undervalued and there was an excellent opportunity to invest. So, how will you know when the market reaches that point?
Most investors consider earnings one of the major determining factors that affects stock prices. That is, how do earnings reports compare to forecasts and or budgets? Current stock prices are in many ways based upon future expectations of company performance. So, when companies continue to miss expectations, and or expectations are simply too high, the stock price is determined to be overvalued, and thus a correction is made in the price. Moreover, panic selling in uneducated investors can and will rear its ugly head as well, but to the educated investor that ugly head means easy money. Over the past year and few months, quarter after quarter, companies were reporting worse than expected earnings per share, and stock prices plummeted. However, you can expect a rebound after some sort of stability in stock price is found in meeting expectations, even bad expectations.
Thus, once a companies earnings and performance begins meeting analysts expectations, the stock price volatility will decline. Until then however, we will see wild swings over short periods of time. Then, as companies start to turn the corner, and beat expectations, you can expect stock prices to begin their climb back up.
Bottom line, look for consistency in earnings before a rebound will occur, anyone whom arbitrarily throws out a date in the future for a recovery without some sort of basis other than things like consistency in earnings is simply guessing.
Nationalization of the American banking Industry; What does it mean for taxpayers and investors?
The mere word “nationalization” strikes fear in the hearts of many free market capitalists, but should it? What does nationalization mean for the American public, what about private investors with a current stake in these companies? What will happen if these banks are not nationalized? What will happen if they are nationalized? Has any other country faced a similar situation, and if so how did they handle it? What was their outcome? By now, you’ve heard it all; Without the bailout the economy will collapse; This bailout is a farce, and taxpayers are footing the bill for Wall-Street bonuses. Who is right or wrong? Why did wall-street react so badly to the latest stimulus package approval? This analysis will attempt to answer all of these questions and more in hopes to educate the American public as to what the American Congress, Treasury, and President are attempting to do to remedy this current financial crisis, and if what they are doing seems to be the right course of action or not, depending on which side of the fence you sit, main-street or wall-street.
First, a quick (non-comprehensive) recap of what got us into this situation is necessary:
- In 1999, The Clinton Administration urges Congress to allow Fannie Mae to ease lending restrictions “that could help increase home ownership rates among minorities and low-income consumers, the Fannie Mae Corporation is easing the credit requirements on loans that it will purchase from banks and other lenders.” Although their intentions were probably good, lack lending standards allowed lenders to put individuals into positions they didn’t care if they could repay, because the money was too good.
- In 2000, due to a re-assessment of the housing market by HUD, anti-predatory lending rules were put into place that disallowed risky, high-cost loans from being credited toward affordable housing goals. In 2004, these rules were dropped and high-risk loans were again counted toward affordable housing goals.
- The early to mid 2000’s saw a boom in housing prices, as more and more consumers entered the market, driving up existing home values and real estate prices in order to meet demand, due to a limited supply. Not to mention, extremely short-sighted risks were taken in compensation for bonuses and fees by banks, loan authorities, and real estate investors. Moreover, existing homeowners took out 2nd mortgages in record numbers, and spent the money in every way imaginable, so when their home values dropped, many owed more than their property was worth.
- By 2007, defaults on these sub-prime mortgages began to mount, and demand began to drop. Real Estate prices began their fast decline as defaults grew and demand dropped. Banks started realizing losses and investors began selling off their stakes in the mortgage back securities and the downward cycle began.
- Consumers whom once had all of this extra money because of their second mortgages and booming economy, faced the tough reality that they were now spending money they really didn’t have. In short, retail sales began their rapid decline and so did most business in America and around the world. Just as home prices were artificially inflated by an artificial demand, so were stock prices, as consumers could not maintain their spending levels forever.
And so we’ve made it to current day, and we have watched a multitude of banks and other financial institutions collapse, while others have been saved, if nothing else temporarily. The government passed a $700 billion dollar bill meant to help the ailing institutions and stimulate the economy and consumer spending. However, the first one didn’t work as effectively as hoped and so another stimulus bill has been passed in hopes of curbing this recession. However, the second one has little mention of helping these banks further, and the market reacted negatively.
Now, back to the topic at point; What is Nationalization? For this discussion, nationalization means the government steps in and assumes ownership of the institution.
So, what does that mean for the American public? Keep in mind, there’s no clear answer to these problems, or they would have already been solved, therefore, all we can do is weigh our remaining options. Let’s consider a few options being proposed or that are in place to help correct our banking problems; Option A: Provide the largest banks with recapitalization, allowing the less market dependent banks to collapse, in hopes of attracting new private investors while allowing the market correct itself (which is what we’ve already tried and it hasn’t worked to attract many private investors); Option B: Allow them all to fail, hope new businesses will be able to step in and takeover; or Option C: have the government step in and take over control and hope they will be able to save them.
- Option A hasn’t worked because it hasn’t restored investor confidence, and the credit markets have been partially frozen as a result of banks not willing to lend to each other in fears of defaults. Inevitably, these banks are destined to fail unless something miraculous happens. Not to mention, this option will drive up inflation.
- Option B is extremely dangerous as we would be further risking a complete economic collapse. It would be quite difficult for smaller banks to even get financing to start operations. This option will likely make the blow more severe and fast, however, some may argue it is inevitable. The question then becomes, what is better, take one huge hit at once, or a bunch over a time period.
- Option C is the last resort, by this time Option B has likely failed, and The US government steps in as the biggest business and guarantor of all. The problem becomes when do they step in, what adverse affects are caused such as inflation from printing money, among other issues like of lack of competition, etc. With this option, you effectively create a larger government, and in its nature is a bureaucracy and extremely inefficient.
It seems as if only a hybrid of these options makes more sense than one option alone. Option A seems to be useless, like trying to put out a high rise apartment fire with a single fire extinguisher. Instead of allowing private investors to pay for their risks, they tax all of the people and give them a minority interest, while allowing the same ineffective management to continue in their roles. It just seems as if throwing money at the problem won’t solve the issue. Private investors surely can’t mind this if they decide to stick with the company, rather than completely losing their investment. American People end up on the short side of the stick here, and investors make out better than they would have probably otherwise.
Option B seems most logical for the American public, allowing new companies to rebuild trust and redefine efficient and smart business practices. Investors probably fear this option, which may force them out of the investment market they are already wary of. Option C, given the Government doesn’t overpay shareholders for their equity positions – makes the most sense for the American Taxpayers, only if B doesn’t work first. If the government steps in, private investors get compensation, and the American taxpayer becomes responsible for footing the bills to maintain the banks. Having said that, keep in mind what these same people have done with Medicaid, Social Security, and the likes, and you will see that your chances of mismanagement may even in fact rise. The main objective in nationalizing the banks, at least in the short term, would be to restore investor confidence, etc. However, without effective legislation guaranteeing these banks won’t be allowed to do the same thing, the government would have a difficult time when privatizing the businesses once again to be able to sell the banks back to private investors,
Japan faced a similar situation to that of the US just over 10 years ago, here is an interesting analysis and comparison of their situation and attempted remedies as it relates to ours. They’re still fighting this battle today, and they used a combination of all three of the above approaches.
With regards to the most recent (2nd) Stimulus plan and why the market reacted so negatively, it should be quite obvious (I wrote a couple of articles about this). The new stimulus bill, unlike the last, does very little if nothing to aid the banks. In fact, most all of the spending is on social entitlements. It does however provide more tax relief so hopefully people will spend that money to help business. For those claiming this bill is a farce, I would agree it does nothing to address the banking problems, however, it does help a select group of people and tax-payers in general. To say we wouldn’t be any worse off without the latest stimulus, seems reasonable, to say the least.
Bottom line, Wall Street is looking for free hand-outs after having their hands slapped for scamming people by setting the market up for failure (as a result of what some would argue was congressional policy changes to accommodate low income families). No matter what though, most all people have some sort of tie to wall street, through their 401k plans or pension plans, through insurance products and more, to hurt them is to hurt yourself in many ways. On the other hand, the American people and investors alike question why you should give money once again to the same people that screwed us in the first place. There is no clear answer to our problems, however, there are clearly better options than others. Nationalizing our banks may be our last (and only remaining) option, however, if the government doesn’t immediately thereafter restore investor confidence, by reassuring investors past fraud will be prosecuted and the same problems won’t reoccur, this economy won’t come out this recession anytime soon. In fact, this may result in a complete economic collapse of the American Government and our currency, let’s not forgot what happened to the USSR not even 20 years ago, most academics laughed at the notion of their potential collapse.
How did we get into this mess; Answers to the how and why of this global financial recession.
Most of my readers come here for simple to understand answers to their questions. Thus, the following is not a comprehensive answer, however, it should be simple enough to understand for the average adult, without a college degree.
The most simple explanation to why we are in this current financial crisis is because of this so called “sub-prime mortgage” mess, and everything that followed it. Now, what does that mean? Our Federal reserve is responsible for setting monetary policy, in other words they indirectly set the rates banks use for lending. The banks then sets the standards for individuals to borrow. When the Federal reserve dropped the prime rate of lending to banks from nearly 7% to 1% in the early 2000’s, this set off a lending frenzy by the banks. The banks new that their was very little cost to their lending, so they could make money off of anyone, even those with poor credit, or so they thought (as long as demand kept increasing). Wall Street bought in on the action too, packaging up these sub-prime loans and selling them to investors, whom in turn were making a killing off of them in the beginning. As more and more people were able to qualify for loans (when they shouldn’t have been able to), they drove the prices of all homes, because as the supply of homes grows smaller, all other home prices would go up as people competed to buy them.
Then, when these people with poor credit and sub-prime mortgages started to default on their mortages, the investments started losing money, and people started selling them off in record numbers. Moreover, the banks profitability began to plummet as well. When wall-street saw this happen, everyone started pulling their money out of the market, to protect from losses.
Now, at the same time all of this “sub-prime lending” was going on, you have a bunch of good credit homeowners, who saw their home prices sky-rocket, and they began taking out home-equity loans, and spending that money on anything and everything, thinking their home value would continue to rise. Basically, they were taking artificial gains and spending it, and in turn artificially inflating companies values. When investors realized too, that these companies that were making a ton of money, were only doing so because of this “artificial boom” and that the future wouldn’t be so bright, as future profit estimates dropped, doom and gloom overtook the market.
To compound the problem, normally rational people, whom didn’t participate in any of this, decided they too should protect themselves, and so they started pulling their money out of the stock market and hoarded it, or bought up government bonds, and they still are.
Now, the banks, in trying to correct their bad investments, have tightened credit standards on consumers to the point that people aren’t able to continue to maintain their lifestyles. The banks have not only tightened consumer lending, but also business lending. With consumers unable to spend, and businesses unable to borrow, the opposite phenomena is occurring. Businesses are laying off people, as they don’t need to produce as much to meet demand, and they are stopping expansion plans and new product development as well.
When will this all work itself out? Well, the market is irrational right now, just as it was when we were on this mega spending/lending frenzy. The market will correct itself in time, and those people hoarding their cash will eventually buy back in, helping unfreeze credit markets and get people buying products and services again, and allow businesses to pick back up spending and hiring. The last major recession in the early 2000’s lasted nearly 3 years, and witnessed a near 50% decline in value. My opinion, is now is the best time to buy as the market is still unreasonably low due to consumer confidence, and these companies are worth more than they are selling for.
Companies that are good indicators of the entire economy; Intel, Wal-Mart, Pulte Homes, Caterpillar
An interesting article over at CNN pointed out Intel’s revised forecast showing a further downturn in their businesses stood as an overall economic indicator that the economy was worsening. Their thought process behind this was that Intel reaches nearly all aspects of the world in consumers and businesses alike. While this seems to have some merit, it seems like there are some major risks in assuming this is true. Namely, you are assuming that their competition has nothing to do with any downturn in their business as well as many other factors such as operational efficiency and so on. This article will attempt to identify a few other publicly traded companies that tend to reach across multiple industries around the world in hopes of coming up with a better indicator than just relying on a single, technology company as an indicator of future expectations.
Wal-Mart, with operations in nearly every civilized country of the world, seems like a good option to start with, as they seem to be representative of retail sales giants alike. It maybe necessary and diligent to keep in mind that Wal-Mart may somewhat benefit from economic downturns, being a low cost alternative. Having said that, the impact of a recession would still likely have some negative impact on their business.
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Summary

However, over the last year or so, specifically around their last reproted Quarter, their stock price has dropped based upon their performance and expecations. Lately though, you can see that expecations must be turning around. Their next earnings release will be in mid Feb, and in my estimation could be an even greater indicator of the future health of our economy than Intel.
Pulte Homes, Inc.
Summary
Caterpillar Inc.
Where did all the money in the stock market go?
Since so many people are confused about this, I figured I would try and simplify and help you understand exactly where all this money went. But first you have to understand where it came from.
Let’s take one company for example. When this company (we’ll call it company XYZ) started, it was private, meaning the money to start and operate the company was brought in by its 3 owners, Timmy, Doug, and Jimmy. They each brought 1,000 dollars to the table.
By the end of the third month of operations in selling cat shampoo, they knew they needed to expand, because their business was selling this shampoo like hotcakes. However, their own cash flow was limited – so they knew they had to go outside and find some investors if they wanted to grow larger, faster. So, they decided to go to the investment bank and presented their case for taking their company public to raise additional capital, to buy a new store, and expand on their technology. After the investment bank reviewed their business, they decided they liked these 3 guys and their model, so they would help them write up an initial public offering, to help them raise additional capital. So, company XYZ’s investment bankers go to market, and persuade their investors to buy stock in team 1380. Before you know it, XYZ has raised 10,000,000 by selling 10,000,000 shares. Thus, each share is worth $1.
This money is now that of the XYZ company. They can do with it what they want, hopefully, to make additional money, in some cases these owners would pocket a good chunk of cash – but if they are smart they would use it to generate much more and make the value of the company greater. Now that the first round of capital has been raised, those stocks are held by private investors whom can do with them whatever they want, typically, buy or sell depending on how well the company is performing. They trade their stocks at the stock exchange. Those shares all start with a $1 value, but after the first day – they are only worth what someone is willing to pay for them. Similar to buying a house, the value of the home or stock goes up and down depending on the market and how the consumers feel about that market. Say the next day, a new company came out in the same industry, some may think this company will be a threat to your company, and instantly people want to sell their shares in your company, even at a loss, because they think the stock will be worth much less in a few months, they will take a small loss on their investment, rather than waiting for the stock to be worthless as they see the threat to your businesses as very real. On the flipside, investors may drive up the price of the stock, by thinking it is undervalued.. so they will be willing to pay more than a dollar of the initial share price driving up the stock value. Maybe that’s because they see your sales revenues continuing to grow over a period, and they know people will flock to buying shares in your company as people realize how strong a business it is.
So, real money has exchanged hands when the investors bought shares at the IPO (initial public offering).. money exchanged hands between ownership and investors. After ownership sells as many shares as possible, they stop selling. The only way for investors to buy more shares, is to buy between themselves. One guy may be willing to part with all of his shares if you are willing to pay a premium of 10 cents a share.. but their has to be someone that is willing to buy them, and someone to think what you think.
So, when we see a company’s stock price move up from it’s IPO price of $1 to $10, we are seeing what the investors think the value of the stock is (based upon a number of things). Investor A bought the stock for $1 a share, and after a couple years of steady growth and performance of the company, other investors drive the value of the stock up to $10 as they want in on the company. Investor A thinks he has made all he can with the company and the stock is too high, and it really isn’t worth the $10, so he decides to sell. He instantly makes profit in the difference for which he bought it and the amount it has gone up. Smart man, because news suddenly breaks that research says that there is a chemical you’ve been using in that shampoo, and your product could actually harm precious kittens. Overnight, people try and sell their shares off, knowing that sales and the business will likely fail because nobody wants your products anymore. Throughout the firesale, people are speculating on the value of the stock. Investor B waits until the stock is worth $5 and bails, Investors C thinks the company can still overcome the problem and $5 is a bargain, so he buys.. and so on until the price steadies.. whether that be at 0 value.. or somewhere above that.
Now think of the stock market as a place with thousands of companies like this and you can start to understand where exactly the money went. It’s either in the stock market, or in the hands of the investors. Everyone else that isn’t investing is likely working for one of these companies.
Hope this helps.
Your trusty neighborhood Accountant – Mark
Don’t be scared of the bear market, stock market crash
Bear markets come and go, below you will see that we’ve experienced several over the last half century. Some could argue this is the best time to buy, as prices are low. Just keep in mind your goals, you’re in this for the long haul and you will experience market declines over your investment life. The market will rebound, it just may take some time – so keep investing and you will gain back more than you’ve lost.
The last ten bear markets:
August 1956-October 1957 Lasted 14.7 months, -21.6% market loss
December 1961-June 1962 6.4 months, -28.0%
February 1966-October 1966 7.9 months, -22.2%
November 1968-May 1970 17.9 months, -36.1%
January 1973-October 1974 20.7 months, -48.2%
September 1976-March 1978 17.5 months, -19.4%
January 1981-August 1982 19.2 months, -25.8%
August 1987-December 1987 3.3 months, -33.5%
July 1990-October 1990 2.9 months, -19.9%
March 2000-October 2002 30.5 months, -49.1%
Source: Standard & Poor’s Corporation.
A look at the companies that prospered during the great depression, recession proof your investments
Today, we are facing very similar economic situations to that of our past. By learning about our past, we can better understand our current economic crisis, and help make predictions about our future and with whom to invest our money. Over the last century, one of the United States most trying and difficult times was during the Great Depression of the 1930’s. By looking at the companies that weathered the storm, we can better understand why some companies stay afloat and sometimes succeed, while other businesses fail and often quite miserably. Below, I will take you through my thoughts and research regarding how to best accomplish this task, along with my findings, I’m certain you will find this information very valuable.
I wanted to accomplish the following with my research;
- Identify major companies/businesses/industries that made it through the great depression when financial times were at there worst
- Figure out what was hot, popular, and profitable in the 1930’s and see who the present day companies are that do the same.
- Figure out what companies profit in time of war and shortly after.
In attempting to identify the major companies that weathered the great depression I decided it was best to look at those major companies tracked on the Dow Jones Industrial Average. I did this because the Dow Jones tracked only the largest American Industrial corporations and their stock prices. If a company became too small, it would be delisted, and either failed or wasn’t longer much of an economic force on the economy with regards to jobs, etc. Basically, my thinking was that if they remained on the list over the years, the companies stock price remained strong enough, and they were the most profitable companies of that time. (Taking a look at the companies that made up the DJIA from the late 20’s to the late 50’s, shows us a timeline of which of the largest companies weathered the storm of the great depression. Below is the list of companies that were listed as part of the DJIA in that timeframe that remained on the list over the years:)
From the above linked list, I looked at the companies that remained on the list at least 10 times, below I will discuss what they made and did that allowed them to make it through the storm of the great depression, and they are as follows:
Allied Chemical: “Allied is a holding company whose operations may be divided into five groups: The Solvay Process Division produces soda ash and caustic soda. The General Chemical Division makes sulphuric acid, nitric acid, hydrochloric acid, acetic acid and related products. The business of this division is steady, does not promise great expansion, must be considered a valuable backlog. The Barrett Division is primarily in the coal tar business. Coal tar is used for dyestuffs, drugs, synthetic plastics, wood preservatives. The residue goes into roads and roofs. This division makes Tarvia, one of the few Allied products known to the public. The National Aniline & Chemical Division makes dyestuffs. It is thought to contribute little to Allied’s net. The Atmospheric Nitrogen Division. A justification of all of Allied’s policies is the success it has had in the production of synthetic nitrogen. The War found the world dependent upon Chile’s natural nitrate. Germany met the problem by developing synthetic nitrogen, and Allied’s accomplishments in the same direction have made the U. S. independent of other countries for this chemical valuable in peace, invaluable during war.”
The above information was found on this TIME artilce from the early 1930’s.
- Allied has since been acquired by a few different companies, most recently Honeywell, whom, ironically dropped off of the DJIA in February 2008. The most important thing to take from this company, in my opinion, would be this company was responsible for much products that went into building infastructure (roads, homes, factories, buildings, etc.) and aiding in products that would supply chemical weapons for war.
American Can: “This container industry giant was created in 1901 through the merger of dozens of plants around the country, including some in the Chicago area. Although it was not headquartered in Chicago, American Can became an important actor in the local economy during the early twentieth century. From the beginning of the century through the 1970s, the company employed thousands of men and women (the local workforce stood at about 2,700 in 1934 and 3,000 in 1974) at several plants around the city. During the final decades of the century, American Can diversified, became less important as a local employer, and eventually ceased to exist as an independent entity. ” This information was found here.
- As you can guess, canned food became big business, and they were able to do well when others couldn’t. Similar businesses today may include Coca-Cola Bottling and I’m certain PEPSI has their own operations to, this would be something to further investigate.
American Smelting: According to wiki: ASARCO LLC is a mining, smelting, and refining company based in Tucson, Arizona that mines and processes primarily copper. The company, a subsidiary of Grupo México, is currently in Chapter 11 bankruptcy. ASARCO plans to emerge from bankruptcy in 2008, and opposes calls for it to totally liquidate its mining and industrial assets. Its three largest open pit mines are the Mission, Silver Bell and the Ray mines in Arizona. Its mines produce 350 to 400 million pounds of copper a year. ASARCO conducts solvent extraction/electrowinning at the Ray and Silver Bell mines in Pima County, Arizona and Pinal County, Arizona and a smelter in Hayden, Arizona. Before its smelting plant in El Paso, Texas was suspended in 1999 it was producing 1 billion pounds of anodes each year. Refining at the mines as well as at a copper refinery in Amarillo, Texas produce 375 million pounds of refined copper each year. ASARCO has 20 superfund sites across the United States, and it is subject to considerable litigation over pollution. India based Sterlite Industries announced the acquisition of Asarco on 31st May, 2008 for US$2.6 billion. Sterlite woul become the world’s third largest copper miner with a combined capacity of 650,000 tonnes a year, if the Asarco deal closes. Grupo Mexico, the current owner, opposes the sale, and hopes to block it [2].”
- Non-Ferrous metal proves valuable in times of recession, just as gold has proved to be a hedge against a falling US dollar.
American Tobacco: “The American Tobacco Company was founded in 1890 by J. B. Duke as a merger between a number of tobacco manufacturers including Allen and Ginter and Goodwin & Company. The company was one of the original 12 members of the Dow Jones Industrial Average in 1896. Akin to the domination of Standard Oil in the same era, the American Tobacco Company dominated the industry by acquiring the Lucky Strike Company and over 200 other rival firms. The company built processing plants and warehouses in Reidsville, North Carolina and Durham. Antitrust action begun in 1907 against the American Tobacco Company, which broke the company into several major companies in 1911. Those companies include: American Tobacco Company, R. J. Reynolds
Liggett & Myers Tobacco Company, and Lorillard. The American Tobacco Company, which started acquiring a wide range of non-tobacco products during the 1970s and 1980s, renamed itself to American Brands in 1986[1], which has since renamed Fortune Brands. American Tobacco became a subsidiary of American Brands for the next ten years until the company shed its tobacco brands to competitors.” Find this and more here.
- The tobacco industry is still strong, however, they continue to face litigation that threatens their future.
Bethlehem Steel:”The Bethlehem Steel Corporation (1857–2003), based in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, was once the second largest steel producer in the United States after Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania-based U.S. Steel. After a decline in the U.S. steel industry and management problems leading to the company’s 2001 bankruptcy, the company was dissolved and the remaining assets sold to International Steel Group in 2003. In 2005, ISG merged with Mittal Steel, ending U.S. ownership of the assets of Bethlehem Steel.
During its life, Bethlehem Steel was also one of the largest shipbuilding companies in the world and was one of the most powerful symbols of American industrial manufacturing leadership. Bethlehem Steel’s demise is often cited as one of the most prominent examples of the U.S. economy’s transition away from industrial manufacturing and its inability to compete with cheap foreign labor.”
Chrylser:
Chrysler manufactures vehicles, in recent news they are being severely and adversely affected by oil prices and their business continues to suffer.
General Electric Company:
Aircraft Jet Engines
Electricity
Entertainment
Finance
Gas Turbine
Generation
Industrial Automation
Lighting
Medical Imaging Equipment
Medical Software
Motors
Railway Locomotives
Wind Turbine
General Foods:“In November, 1985 General Foods was acquired by Philip Morris Companies (now Altria Group, Inc.) for $5.6 billion, the largest non-oil acquisition to that time.” General Foods, as you guessed, was a major food manufacturer and restaraunt chain owner.
Listed below are some of their major acquisitions:
1953 – General Foods acquired Perkins Products Company, maker of Kool-Aid.
1957 – The company introduced Tang, which became available nationally two years later.
1964 – General Foods introduced Maxim, the first American brand of freeze-dried coffee.
1968 – General Foods makes its ill-advised purchase of the Burger Chef fast-food chain.
1969 – General Foods buys Rax Restaurants.
1971 – General Foods acquired the maker of Gevalia.
1978 – General Foods sells Rax Restaurants to Rac.
1981 – General Foods acquires Oscar Mayer & Company.
General Motors Corporation: “is engaged in the worldwide development, production and marketing of cars, trucks and parts. The Company develops, manufactures and markets vehicles worldwide through its four automotive regions: GM North America (GMNA), GM Europe (GME), ” per their company website.
International Harvester:“now Navistar International Corporation) was an agricultural machinery, construction equipment, vehicle, commercial truck, and household and commercial products manufacturer. It was the result of a 1902 merger between the McCormick Harvesting Machine Company and Deering Harvester Company, along with three smaller agricultural equipment firms: Milwaukee; Plano; and Warder, Bushnell, and Glessner (manufacturers of Champion brand). International Harvester sold off the Ag division in 1985 and later renamed the company.” Per wiki.
International Nickel:“In 1902 the International Nickel Company, Ltd. was created in Camden, New Jersey as a joint venture between Canadian Copper, Orford Copper, and American Nickel Works. In 1916, the International Nickel Company of Canada, Ltd. was incorporated as the operating company in Copper Cliff near Sudbury, and in 1918 the company built a new refinery in Port Colborne. The International Nickel Company of Canada, Ltd., first began using the trade name Inco in 1919. In 1929 the corporation underwent a major expansion by absorbing the British-owned Mond Nickel Company. A head office was established in Toronto. During World War II, Inco’s Frood Mine produced 40% of the nickel used in artillery by the Allies. In 1972 the Inco Superstack was built in Sudbury. In 1976, the company’s name was officially changed to Inco Limited. In order to generate cash Inco sold its manufacturing sites of nickel alloys to Special Metals Corporation in 1998. Special Metals Corporation however filed Chapter 11 in March 2002.”
Find more about them here.
As mentioned above, these guys profited from war.
Johns-Manvile: “Johns-Manville is an American corporation involved in the manufacture insulation, roofing materials, and engineered products. The stock was included in the Dow Jones Industrial Average from January 29, 1930 to August 27, 1982.”
Sears Roebuck & Company:is an American mid-range chain of international department stores, founded by Richard Warren Sears and Alvah Roebuck in the late 19th century. They’ve since merged with KMART.
Standard Oil (N.J.): was a predominant American integrated oil producing, transporting, refining, and marketing company. Established in 1870, it operated as a major company trust and was one of the world’s first and largest multinational corporations until it was broken up by the United States Supreme Court in 1911.[3] John D. Rockefeller was a founder, chairman and major shareholder, and the company made him a billionaire and eventually the richest man of all time. More here.
Texas Company: This company is now known to you and I as Texaco. You probably know what they do, if not check here.
U.S. Steel: “is an integrated steel producer with major production operations in the United States and central Europe.”
Union Carbide:gave birth to the modern petrochemicals industry. This is another huge chemical company.
Westinghouse Electric: Some cool facts from wiki:
1920s – enters the broadcasting industry, with stations like KDKA in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and WBZ (AM) in Massachusetts
1930s – enters the nuclear age with an industrial atom smasher.
1934 – opens its Home of Tomorrow in Mansfield, Ohio, to demonstrate Westinghouse home appliances
1935 – completes longest continuous electric steel annealing furnace in the world at Ford Motor Company, Dearborn, Michigan
1930s – funds invention of the magnetohydrodynamic generator
Close up of Westinghouse logo on historic kitchen stove at John & Mable Ringling Museum, Sarasota1940s – enters aviation with airborne radar (defense electronics sold 1996), jet engine propulsion, and ground based airport lighting.
1941 – after years of resistance to the unionization efforts of its employees and to the National Labor Relations Act,[1] signs a national labor agreement with the United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America after a US Supreme Court decision that upheld the Act.[2]
1945 – renames itself the Westinghouse Electric Corporation, and makes first automatic elevator.
Woolworth: was a retail company that was one of the original American five-and-dime stores, who later grew into one of the largest national retail chains until it could no longer compete. More here.
After looking at these companies above it has become apparent during that stock crash, recession, war and economic downturn, the following companies remained the strongest and most profitable (keep in mind we are talking about the largest public companies, not necessarily all companies including privately held ones):
Chemical
Natural resources like oil, mining of different precious metals (such as steel, copper, nickel, etc.)
Utilities
Discount retail stores
Tobacco
Vehicle manufacturing
Machinery and Equipment construction
Home building
Now, would this list relate well to todays markets? Maybe in some regards, but in various other ways not so much. As you know, a few of the major companies listed above are in dire financial positions today, as the market has completely changed (and the American car manufacturers are losing because they are not competitive globally among many other things).
Having kept the above in mind; I would think the best companies to invest in now (in times of war, recession, and bear markets) would be the following:
Keeping in mind that a company still has to be managed properly in order to be profitable, my suggestion would be to invest in companies that produce or supply:
Household goods: (like Proctor and Gamble), Discount grocery and retail stores (like Aldi, Wal-mart, Target, Sears).
Oil Companies: (if there isn’t already a huge bubble in the market that is ready to pop)
Private label companies: (I’m certain that the branded companies will have a harder time selling their goods when there are cheaper alternatives)
Alternative Transportation companies: Over the road truckers might be in for a real shock if they havn’t experienced it already at the pumps, I’m guessing as they lose the ability to make transporting profitable, rail companies will get their business. As oil prices continue to rise, flatcars pushing containers will become common place again.
Low cost providers: People will lose an appetite for extras when it comes down to it. Seek those companies that are generic and cost efficient.
Aerospace companies- and companies whom make defense systems.
War Weapons, artillery, machinery and equipment- There is no telling if the war mongers will continue their invasions, if the liberals have anything to do with the prevention, you can probably count on it.
Now, you may look at some companies I am mentioning, for example food companies, and see that they’re losing money recently. Well, this has to do with their ability to pass rising comodity prices to the consumer quickly enough. Once they’ve stabilized their cost pass through, these companies will post nice gains.
Businesses effected depression? What businesses survived depression? What business thrived in a depression? Best businesses after great depression? Best businesses after the great depression? What businesses survived the big depression? What were the dates when Phoenicians thrived? Successful businesses in the great depression? Which group of americans thrived in the 1920s? What businesses thrived during the depression? What business thrived in the great depression? What businesses did well during the depression? What businesses prospered during the depression? What businesses thrived in the great depression? What businesses did well in the Great Depression? What businesses thrived during great depressions? What businesses excelled during great depression? What business thrived during the great depression? What businesses prospered in the Great depression? What companies thrived during the great depression?







